Whilst technologically processed and produced pieces of pop art canvas employ and utilise objects that are, in general, dominated by common and bright design patterns, all pop art pieces center on a central imagery – defying the elaborateness that Abstract Expressionism had been known for. Though many a number of critics would deduce that the primary reason of why pop art canvas can be classified and categorised under pop art as a distinguishable method and technique can be credited to the interplay of usage of color and even the preference of highly accessible and available popular technology. But how similar are pop art canvas to those pieces of art that are produced during the height of the formation and consolidation of the technique to which we refer as pop art?
Color as a Unifying Concept
Most of pop art canvas pieces that are electronically and digitally produced https://ishino-dc.com/ hat we see today are representations of pictures that are masterfully coloured and vibrant. It can be deduced that most of what is being commercially traded online are but created in the likeness of the work of a single artist. If a portrait could easily represent an artist, then, it would be Marilyn Monroe: Diptych and Andy Warhol. With a relatively efficient and effective production and a high volume demand on the market, it is otherwise astonishing and logical to find most commerce and ventures to defy this easy method of producing a viable art piece.
Imagery as a Universal Theme
Pop art and its sub-branch pop art canvas are unified by the principle of utilising a central imagery to which an art piece would evolve into. Unlike Abstract Expressionism, pop art eliminates the elaborateness of the background in order to justify that an image is worthy to be called an art in itself. However, though considered to be universal, no standard and benchmark had been known to be adhered to in most works. Such fact primarily reflects the principle of relativism to which the pop art primarily had put emphasis on.